Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Sometimes You Just Have To Do It Old School

 No Personal Protection or Self Defense in this article. It's about an Air National Guard Unit deciding to deal with a very real potential problem in the Digital Age. It's about doing it the Old School way when your technology is taken away.

 

 This National Guard unit went completely analog to simulate a cyber attack

Limited comms, no internet and (thankfully) no PowerPoint slides. Just a bunch of airmen with note pads and hand signals.


By Patty Nieberg

From the taskandpurpose website: https://taskandpurpose.com/news/air-national-guard-cyber-attack-exercise/


Published May 23, 2025

A crew chief assigned to the 139th Maintenance Group, Missouri Air National Guard, marshals a C-130 Hercules aircraft for takeoff at Rosecrans Air National Guard Base in St. Joseph, Missouri, May 13, 2025. The 139th Operations Group conducted a training exercise simulating a cyberattack that denied access to the internet, GPS and phones, challenging aircrews to complete their missions without digital communication tools. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Michael Crane)
A crew chief assigned to the 139th Maintenance Group, Missouri Air National Guard, marshals a C-130 Hercules aircraft for takeoff at Rosecrans Air National Guard Base in St. Joseph, Missouri, May 13, 2025. U.S. Air National Guard photo by Michael Crane.

Airmen were sent running half a mile across base with sticky notes to alert the operations team of the details for the C-130 takeoff. When the aircraft arrived to airdrop of water and ammunition to troops in combat, ground crews sent up smoke signals to alert pilots that they were engaged with the enemy. Back at home base, it was “controlled chaos,” a pilot said.

It’s what happens when all forms of electronic communication are wiped out.

It was all part of a simulated cyber attack that the Missouri National Guard’s 139th Operations Group practiced as part of an exercise dubbed “Operations Goes Dark.” Over the course of four days, a simulated U.S. adversary conducted intermittent attacks on the base, jamming internet communications, leaving teams to resort to pen and paper, white boards and dry erase markers. For the first two days, the internet was out for hours at a time and by the third and fourth day, it was down altogether.

The exercise was done to prove that the airwing could operate without access to computers or personal cell phones, all while sending up and landing aircraft and resupplying troops.

“We have the potential for being involved with real-world adversaries that have the ability to do this,” said Capt. Kyle Hutchison, a 180th Airlift Squadron pilot who planned the exercise.

The focus of the operation was on a cyber attack’s impact to flight operations, which begins long before the planes even leave the ground. Without access to everyday digital systems for updates to things like aircraft maintenance, crew readiness or inclement weather, they resorted to passing information, person-to-person, using the same techniques as aviators and ground crews in the 20th century.

“The big picture: if other people aren’t helping us get to where we need to be, we’re not gonna fly the airplanes and execute the mission,” said Lt. Col. Jason Lehman, chief of safety for the 139th Airlift Wing. “We tried to change the mindset of going back to the old school mentality of we don’t necessarily need that to effectively execute a mission. We went back to whiteboards and dry erase markers and drew out the mission by hand.”

The chance for human error

The challenges began early on. Planning briefs usually include PowerPoints up on a screen, but for this exercise they had to throw that out. They also had to change the way they communicated the stakes of the cyber attack from the top down.

“You can’t just pick up the phone and say, ‘hey, this is so and so,’” Hutchison said. “Being able to do that is a real real kick in the pants when you’re not used to operating that way.”

In normal circumstances, air traffic personnel would use radios to communicate with pilots, but instead they had runners outside watching the aircraft launch and bringing back information to the operations group.

Hutchison said it’s usually a “constant process” of figuring out if the aircraft are in good standing maintenance-wise, when they’re ready for pre-flight inspections, how much fuel is on board and the location of the plane. In order to communicate all of the details, and ask questions, they used the runners, but this slowed things down.

“There are a lot of very simple things that we use phones to communicate things to each other about. If you didn’t have that, think about how much extra time that would inflict on you,” he said.

It also added a human challenge of playing the game of telephone — where information could change ever so slightly after it was passed between people. Something as simple as takeoff times could be miscommunicated and then that error might throw other operational plans off.

“There’s always a way where there could potentially be the human dimensions aspect of this where somebody messes up something or misspeaks,” Hutchison said. “We’re human. It happens. But that’s one of those situations where you pray that it doesn’t happen in a conversation that was super important.”

In addition to runners, mission support personnel tested the use of satellite phones to call flight service stations “that would be outside of the affected region of jamming” to get up-to-date information on factors that would be crucial to the aircrews like weather.

For pilots, Hutchison said the exercise emphasized the need to train “clock to chart to ground techniques.” This meant pilots using flight time, paper maps and visual aids on the ground to navigate without GPS. On the ground, personnel used smoke signals to alert pilots that the drop zone wasn’t safe and it had been overtaken or disrupted by enemy forces.

“I think that was an eye opening and kind of a shocking revelation because everybody had done this at some point in their career going through pilot training or nav school but it’s been a long time since they had done that,” Hutchison said. “It identified areas that are challenging with it, but I think it also opened the door for us to be able to do this more routinely.”

The broader lesson, according to Hutchison, was the need for an established analog process that’s routinely updated and can be used to vet air crews and generate flight authorizations. All of those factors are part of the planning process, but are key to aircraft being able to take off and land successfully, he said.

“So many people have their hand in something in order to get this to get a crew out the door, and, I don’t think that it’s talked about,” he said. “That is the part of the puzzle that it takes a lot more bites of the pie in order to complete the circle.”

Limitations and future exercises

While the Air Wing communicated their plans for the exercise, Lehman and Hutchison said one of their biggest challenges was getting other offices on base to play ball.

“We were kind of in an exercise bubble here where it was the operations group doing this, but the rest of the base was not under the exercise,” Lehman said. “Next time, lessons learned for a bigger exercise for us is getting everyone involved.”

They were also limited by the fact that air traffic controllers still had to be alert for nearby civilian aircraft that were flying near the base. It was “non-negotiable” for safety reasons, Hutchison said.

In future exercises, Lehman said they would benefit from the challenges of operating in a more mountainous environment from a risk management and environmental analysis perspective, since Missouri and eastern Kansas have relatively flat terrain.

Given how likely it is that the different services will have to work together in a conventional fight like the one the U.S. military is preparing for, they’ll eventually have to practice analog flight operations with the other branches, as well, Lehman said.

“As we know, different services communicate differently,” he said. “Sometimes just the lingo barrier can cause issues.”

And that’s before you have people shouting messages to runners who have to run across the airbase to relay that information.

Sunday, May 25, 2025

Sunday With Blackthorn - Street Craft: ATM Awareness

 From Tony Blauer (Yeah, I know he's sometimes the cure for insomnia but even he gets something right). The 'deception' strategy he shows in the first video is something I actually used one time in a Citibank ATM area. 

And yes, it actually worked. 

So give it a look, and keep an open mind.


 


 

Also, here is a link to  PDF article where several  people commented on how they also used the deception Technique successfully.

 

 http://library.crossfit.com/free/pdf/CFJ_2012_11_Fight_Achauer.pdf

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

"Workout" Wednesday - Sometimes Working Out Means More Than Your Fitness Or Your Physical Techniques

 Let's let David James break it down for you. So, Ahem, Pay Attention!


 Please Remember To Click On The 'Watch On Youtube' Icon

Sunday, May 18, 2025

Sunday With Blackthorn - Never Count On A By-Rote Combination......Unless

 A lot of people  will say that "By-Rote" Combinations can't be depended on because you never know how the other guy is going to react. And to a degree, that's true. However if something happens and you get confronted, you need to lead off with something that will at the very least cause your assailant to suddenly realize that he was no longer the aggressor, but you were.

That is the real point of this video from Urban Combatives. Everybody is different in terms of build, weight, age, body mechanics. The idea is not just use  some combination that you were taught, but rather to find a combination that comes naturally to you. Something that will allow you to be the one changing the scenario to your advantage.

 


 

Friday, May 16, 2025

Free "Gifts" Found In Chinese Digital Imports.......Killswitches In Solar Energy Power Inverters

 Chinese ‘kill switches’ found in US solar farms

Chinese “kill switches” have been found hidden in American solar farms, prompting calls for Ed Miliband to halt the rollout of renewables.

On Thursday, the Energy Secretary was urged to impose an “immediate pause” on his green energy blitz to review whether UK solar plants are also at risk.

The components found in the US included cellular radios capable of switching off the equipment remotely, raising serious concerns about grid security, according to Reuters.

 

To Continue Reading The Article, Click The Link Below; 


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/15/chinese-kill-switches-found-in-us-solar-farms/

Thursday, May 15, 2025

Now Here's Some Creative Banking For You

 Chinese Money Launderers moving Sinaloa Cartel Money through US Banks in Southern California.

Who'd A Thunk it?

 Bags of Cash From Drug Cartels Flood Teller Windows at U.S. Banks

Story by Dylan Tokar, Justin Baer, Vipal Monga
Original Publication from The Wall Street Journal 

On a hazy Southern California morning, undercover police officers watched Jiayong Yu step out of a Range Rover in a strip-mall parking lot and walk into a Chase bank with a black-leather backpack full of cash.

At the teller window, Yu pulled out stacks of bills and waited while a woman fed them into a cash-counting machine. After Yu left, an officer asked the teller if he had deposited more than $10,000, the threshold requiring banks to flag transactions to federal regulators.

More like $100,000, the teller said. By then, Yu was already on his way to Chase and Bank of America branches in Claremont, Calif., about 35 miles away.

Federal authorities allege that Yu worked for an underground banking network that bought dollars at a discount from Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel and sold them at a premium, largely to Chinese nationals in the U.S.

The network allegedly handled some $50 million in proceeds from drug trafficking over four years, depositing a portion of the tainted cash at ATMs and teller windows at major banks including Citibank in cities around Los Angeles County, according to federal prosecutors.

To Read the Whole Article, click on the link below; 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/bags-of-cash-from-drug-cartels-flood-teller-windows-at-us-banks/ar-AA1ENiWq

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Street Craft - How Close Is Too Close?

 The following article is from the nrawomen.com site. I recently found it, and I have to say there are quite a few good, well written, practical articles there. More importantly, most of these articles are just as applicable to men, as they are to women. So take a look at this article, and decide for yourself.

Understanding Attack Range

original link at  https://www.nrawomen.com/content/understanding-attack-range

A realistic understanding of how close is too close will help keep you safe. 

by posted on February 4, 2024

In criminal encounters, there are two types of attack range you need to be aware of. The first is the distance at which an individual can physically assault you without giving you any warning, represented by approximately arm’s reach; the second, which is longer, is the distance an armed individual can cover before you have time to draw and fire your concealed-carry firearm. When considering how close is too close, it’s important to understand both.

Arm’s-Reach Attack Range
Anyone who can physically reach you before you have time to react is by definition in “attack range” of you. This distance is actually a bit longer than arm’s reach—some experts define it as approximately the distance from the attacker’s eyebrows to the floor, if that distance were laid on the floor between you. Let’s just say that’s five and a half feet or so. Because self-defense is by definition reactionary (you aren’t acting, you’re reacting to something that’s happened, whether that’s an attack or a pre-attack indicator), anyone within about five feet of you can easily throw a punch or grab you before your brain even registers it’s happening.

For that reason, it’s important to keep anyone you are suspicious of outside immediate attack range and to move out of it if you’ve found yourself in it. Pay very close attention to how close someone gets when they approach you. You already know what’s a socially acceptable distance to stand from someone in various situations—“close” in a wide-open parking lot is not nearly as close as “close” in a crowded elevator, for example. Anyone who gets inside your definition of “close” should be treated suspiciously.

Never be afraid to put on your command voice and say “That’s close enough” to anyone who’s approaching you, and never be afraid to move away from someone who makes you uncomfortable. If a suspicious person has closed distance on you in a way that you can’t escape from, that’s a major red flag, and you should be in condition or maybe even red, depending on the other context clues.

Distance buys you time to react. The criminal already knows that, and he knows that if he rushes into your attack range from a distance away, you’ll notice and react. But if he slowly and subtly moves into range while engaging you in conversation, you’re less likely to notice him setting the trap until he’s close enough to spring it. Even better (for him), if he can get you to step into attack range yourself—which you might do with someone you’re arguing with or trying to scare off—you will put yourself in the trap and make his job easy.

Draw hard, firm boundaries about your personal space, and treat anyone who intentionally violates those boundaries as a problem, because they are. If you are trapped and can’t back up, do whatever you can to put distance or an obstacle between you. You can even try to maneuver yourself to one side—preferably to his left, which is statistically more likely to be his weak side. This increases the distance he has to move to reach you if he is right-handed. When you’re in this trapped situation, if the person who has you trapped does turn out to be a violent actor, you are in big trouble. Your best hope now is to try to fail his interview before he kicks off the violence. One way you can do that is by causing a scene if there is anyone without shouting distance. Another way is to shift your body into a bladed, “fighting” stance. As a women, you’re not very likely to intimidate a man into avoiding a physical fight with you, but just moving your body into an offensive stance lets him know that you know what’s going on, you’re not going to make this easy for him, and he still has time to select another victim.

Closing-the-Distance Attack Range
Back in the 1980s, a police trainer named Lt. Dennis Tueller developed what has become known as the 21-foot rule. Through an experiment, he found that the average police trainee could draw his firearm and fire two shots in the same amount of time it took an average man to cross 21 feet from a standing start. Thus, it became commonplace in self-defense circles to claim that anyone less than 21 feet from you could cut you with a knife before you had time to stop the attack, and anyone farther away than 21 feet could reliably be stopped, and therefore, 21 feet was considered a “safe distance” away unless the attacker had a firearm. Many self-defense gurus began teaching students this distance as a guideline on when to draw and shoot a firearm.

The 21-foot rule is still widely touted, but experts now agree that it’s bunk, for a lot of reasons. First, “average” is just average. You might be slower or faster than average; the attacker might be slower or faster than average. Second, the experiment involved shooters using open-carry holsters, and you’re probably concealed carrying, which automatically increases the time it takes you to draw. If you’re wearing heavy winter clothing, your draw will be even slower.

Third, if you’re not law enforcement, you don’t have the same goals, directives and legal protection as law enforcement does. Cops are required to deal with crazy armed people. You aren’t; you have the option to disengage if you’re able, and aside from that, it’s not common for a criminal to pull a knife on you from a considerable distance and then start charging you. He’s much more likely to get close to you (within arm’s-reach attack range) surreptitiously or with some kind of ruse, then reveal his weapon when he’s close enough to use it. 

But perhaps most importantly, the shooters in the experiment were standing in front of a known, non-threatening, non-moving target on the range with a clear directive to fire. There was almost no reaction time built in other than the time it takes to hear the “fire” command. You, on the other hand, will be reacting to many stimuli at once. It will take your brain time to notice someone suspicious, note that they have a firearm, overcome your normalcy bias and realize that hey, this is a real problem I need to address immediately. You can work on shortening your reaction time and decision making time through training, but you’ll never be as fast as a shooter standing in front of a target who is simply waiting on the command to fire. In addition, your target will be moving. You might be moving as well. It might be raining or foggy or dark or you might face some other condition that makes your vision less than ideal.

And, it’s worth noting that in Tueller’s original experiments, even the trainees who were able to get two shots off in the 1.5 seconds before the “attacker” reached them were often still “wounded” by the knife. Either shots weren’t center-mass or they were good kill shots but the attacker still had enough time to inflict damage while they were bleeding out.

At any rate, the 21-foot rule has been thoroughly debunked. You will need to rely on feeding context clues into your decision making model to determine at what distance someone represents a threat, and therefore what distance you should draw and/or fire. Staying in condition yellow will help you notice potential problems before they get within arm’s reach attack range, and you should never be afraid to keep distance between yourself and someone you find suspicious. Move out of range if you can, and use your voice to establish a clear boundary. Anyone who violates that boundary and insists on staying inside your personal “too close” space should be treated as a potential threat.

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Sunday With Blackthorn - W.E. Fairbairn Commando Get-Ups

 These two get-ups are decidedly better for the younger guys out there. However if you take a good look at old Father Mitchell, you'll see that he does the demos not just of the Get-up portion of the technique, but the get knocked down portions as well. Now admittedly he's on a closed cell rubber mat, but the mat is covering a solid wooden floor. Better than concrete, but only by so much.

Additionally, if you go to the Heritage Arts Youtube channel and look at the workouts that this (60+ yr Old) guy does, even some of you younger guys may feel a bit like pikers in your own PT training.

You can decide for yourselves.




Saturday, May 10, 2025

Street Craft - Awareness At Gas Stations

 Right behind ATM's, Gas Stations are probably the next most common places to find yourself in  a bad situation. 

 


 

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Wheelgun Wednesday Today Rich Baker Of Lucky Gunner Ammo Tests Speedloaders

 It's been a while since I put up a video form Rich Baker. Time to correct that@!


 

Friday, May 2, 2025

Misc Humor For A Friday

 Recipe Ideas From Blackthorn 


For The Married Guys


Star Trek Close Combat

 Mr. Spock Combining The Mind Meld With The Tiger Claw Strike